{"id":1115,"date":"2026-10-27T11:34:04","date_gmt":"2026-10-27T11:34:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/regulasshipping.com\/blog\/pgsa-list-moves-to-123-with-senegal-prosperity-and-sea-soar\/"},"modified":"2026-10-27T11:34:04","modified_gmt":"2026-10-27T11:34:04","slug":"pgsa-list-moves-to-123-with-senegal-prosperity-and-sea-soar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/regulasshipping.com\/blog\/pgsa-list-moves-to-123-with-senegal-prosperity-and-sea-soar\/","title":{"rendered":"PGSA list moves to 123 with Senegal Prosperity and Sea Soar"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Iran\u2019s Persian Gulf Strait Authority updated its Strait of Hormuz Non-Compliance List over the weekend. Seatrade Maritime News, by Middle East correspondent Gary Howard on 26 October, is the first detailed English composition check against the published names: the list now contains 123 vessels. SENEGAL PROSPERITY, IMO 9532757, has been added at position 103, a slot previously occupied by a duplicate of entry 102, ANGOLA PROSPERITY, IMO 9896414. SEA SOAR, IMO 9177569, has been added at position 123. Angola Prosperity now appears once. That is a list-status increment on Tuesday 20 October\u2019s dedicated 122-vessel \/ more-than-40-acted-against piece, not a second crackdown and not a rewrite of that status message.<\/p>\n<p>The working primary is the PGSA table as republished on 26 October. It is an Iranian coastal-strait instrument. Seatrade is industry analysis of the roster, not a second PGSA decree. It is not a UKMTO warning, not a JMIC Update 109, not a U.S., EU or UK sanctions designation, and not a naming of this morning\u2019s dedicated 183-26 Al-Faw fire or of Monday\u2019s dedicated 182-26 disablement. Stay with the published names and IMO numbers. Do not invent a new \u201cdealt with,\u201d negotiation, or warning tally; Howard\u2019s 26 October read reprints the 123-line table and the two additions. It does not restate Tuesday\u2019s 40 \/ 19 \/ 2 \/ 30 operating figures. Hold those earlier figures on the dedicated 20 October piece unless PGSA reprints them.<\/p>\n<h2>What the 26 October table actually adds<\/h2>\n<p>Tuesday\u2019s dedicated piece sat on PGSA\u2019s own status message as carried by Mehr and Iran International: 122 vessels added so far, more than 40 \u201cdealt with,\u201d 19 in negotiation, two accepted removal by fulfilling obligations, about 30 on warning. Seatrade\u2019s 19 October composition read of that same roster was 122 entries representing 121 unique vessels, because Angola Prosperity appeared twice. The weekend table removes that duplicate and adds two hulls. The arithmetic is 121 unique on 19\u201320 October, 123 unique on 26 October, +2 named additions, not +1 after a silent deletion. Confirm the name and IMO on the official page before briefing a scrape. Sequential public counts of 124 on 16 October, 122 on 19\u201320 October, and 123 on 26 October are snapshots of one list that has been edited, duplicated and corrected. They are not three different crackdowns.<\/p>\n<p>SENEGAL PROSPERITY, IMO 9532757, is not a new casualty. The hull has sat on the IMO highlighted-incidents board since the 31 August row: 17 NM east of Khasab, Oman, damaged, no pollution, same IMO. SIDR, IMO 9854715, sits on the same 31 August Khasab date with two seafarer fatalities. Seatrade\u2019s 26 October colour says three projectiles struck Senegal Prosperity while exiting the Strait of Hormuz, with damage to the engine room and ballast tanks. That is industry colour on an already-dedicated IMO row. IMO prints damaged, no pollution. It does not print three projectiles, an engine room, or ballast tanks. Hold both lines. Do not rewrite the 31 August IMO file as a new attack because PGSA has now listed the hull. Listing is not an IMO increment. An IMO print is not a PGSA listing. Dual appearance is two instruments on one hull.<\/p>\n<p>Open-register colour only, not a PGSA flag or cargo print: Liberia-flag crude tanker, VLCC-size, MMSI 636026125, call sign A8KZ4, built 2011, about 331 metres, 161,579 gross tons, 320,780 deadweight. Register extracts name HAUT BRION 11 SA as registered owner, Sinokor Maritime \/ Lucky Maritime as commercial and technical management, and Columbia Shipmanagement as ISM manager. That is the same Sinokor \u201cProsperity\u201d family already on the dedicated 122-count roster at ANGOLA PROSPERITY 9896414, GHANA PROSPERITY 9732541, CAMEROON PROSPERITY 9315159, and the earlier Cyprus \/ Singapore \/ Sweden \/ Portugal \/ Algeria \/ Romania \/ Samoa \/ Malaysia \/ Mersin rows. PGSA\u2019s correction is that Angola Prosperity is no longer double-entered. Senegal Prosperity takes the vacated 103 slot. Do not brief the correction as a removal of Angola Prosperity. That hull remains at 102.<\/p>\n<p>SEA SOAR, IMO 9177569, is the new name that was not on Seatrade\u2019s 19 October 122-line reprint and is not on the IMO highlighted-incidents board as at 27 October. Seatrade prints a Panama-flag LPG tanker owned by Hong Kong-based single-ship company Naviboost, with AIS still active in the Middle East. Open-register colour only: built 2000, about 170 metres, 17,840 gross tons, 23,495 deadweight, MMSI 352006507, call sign 3EA5248. Register extracts name Naviboost Global Shipping Ltd as registered owner and commercial manager, and Gemini Shipping Ltd-HKG as ISM manager. PGSA printed neither an attack date, a projectile, a boarding, a radio threat, nor a detention against this hull. Do not invent one. Do not collapse Sea Soar onto Leonora Kosan, onto Update 108\u2019s unnamed Limah LPG, or onto 176-26. Those are different instruments. Sea Soar is a PGSA listing without an IMO confirmed-incident row on this snapshot.<\/p>\n<h2>The list is still running behind the attacks<\/h2>\n<p>Howard\u2019s 19 October reading, wrap on the dedicated 122-count piece, was that the Non-Compliance List is increasingly a scorecard of ships already attacked rather than an advance warning of who Iran intends to detain. At least 39 vessels were attacked before they appeared on the list, on a conservative count, after setting aside OCEAN MOLICA and RIESCO. Eighteen of the 20 ships added on 15 October had already been struck. Senegal Prosperity fits that retrospective pattern: IMO dated the Khasab damage to 31 August; PGSA listed the hull in the weekend increment, nearly two months later. Sea Soar does not yet fit that pattern on open official paper. Absence of an IMO row is not proof the ship was never hailed, threatened, or struck. It is proof this desk does not have a numbered UKMTO, JMIC or IMO product against 9177569. Stay conservative. Do not invent the missing clock.<\/p>\n<p>The 26 October table still carries names already on this desk. PETRO DOLPHIN 1072294, OCEAN MOLICA 9139270, VALTHERA 9296389, ST 1 9256999, MARAN GAS MYSTRAS 9658238, GHANA PROSPERITY 9732541, CAMEROON PROSPERITY 9315159, GAS VELA 9969845, LIPSI 1025033, UHUD 9254939, AL FUNTAS 9653408, CAPE DAO 9219020, AL MARYAH 9393682, LR STEPHANIE 9282625, GFS GISELLE 9704661, SAFEEN PRESTIGE 9593517, NV SUNSHINE 9350288, GFS PRIDE 9349045 and GEM NO. 2 9735373 sit in rows 101\u2013122. ST3 is still not on this reprint. LEONORA KOSAN 9390953 is not on this reprint. SOYIA 9263916 is not on this reprint. CHLOE 9315367 is not on this reprint. Do not brief this afternoon\u2019s dedicated IMO 121-count naming as a PGSA listing. Do not brief a PGSA listing as an IMO confirmed incident. Do not brief Tuesday\u2019s 183-26 fire as a 124th row.<\/p>\n<p>PGSA\u2019s earlier secondary-exposure line remains wrap: vessels cooperating with listed ships \u2014 ship-to-ship transfers, transshipment and similar \u2014 may themselves be added. That is still a planning fact for STS, stores and crew-change work at Fujairah and Khor Fakkan, not a finding that a named lightering hull has been added this weekend. Update 108\u2019s 25 October congestion snapshot \u2014 about 194 at Fujairah \/ Khor Fakkan, about 492 waiting outside Hormuz \u2014 is the practical meeting point. It has not been replaced. The 123-count does not change JMIC\u2019s threat scale.<\/p>\n<h2>Operational implications<\/h2>\n<p>For a master transiting Hormuz or waiting on the UAE east coast, Monday\u2019s table is a list-hygiene task, not a new kinetic warning. JMIC Update 108 remains the numbered threat note: Hormuz SEVERE, Arabian Gulf SUBSTANTIAL, Gulf of Oman MODERATE, 156 incidents since 1 March, surface attacks in the Arabian Gulf a strong possibility away from Hormuz including STS areas off Iraq, report to UKMTO irrespective of AIS. PGSA\u2019s 123-count does not change that scale. It adds two named hulls to the administrative overlay and removes the Angola Prosperity duplicate that had been confusing 122-versus-121 arithmetic since 19 October. A CSO who treats the Non-Compliance List as a targeting feed will brief the wrong instrument. A CSO who ignores the increment because it is not a UKMTO product will miss a detention, confiscation and fine threat that PGSA has left on the table since August, plus an STS-contagion line, now against 123 printed names instead of 122 entries \/ 121 unique.<\/p>\n<p>Dual screening is unchanged, and it still cuts both ways. Appearing on the PGSA list is not a U.S., EU or UK sanctions designation. Separately, U.S. authorities have designated PGSA. Parties screening a Hormuz voyage need their own legal advice on both the Iranian measure and any applicable sanctions exposure from dealing with the listing authority. This desk does not treat \u201capply to PGSA for removal\u201d as a compliance recommendation. It records that Senegal Prosperity is a late listing of an already-confirmed 31 August IMO hull, and that Sea Soar is a new listing without a matching IMO row on the 27 October board. Whether a given owner can use PGSA\u2019s published email path without creating a sanctions issue remains a counsel question, not a master\u2019s-pack finding.<\/p>\n<p>Do not recast 26 October as Update 109, a UKMTO naming, a Hormuz reopen, a U.S. or EU designation of the 123 hulls, a confirmed new seizure, a rewrite of the dedicated 20 October 122\/40 piece except as this increment, or a rewrite of dedicated Pride, Giselle, Ghana Prosperity, Angola Prosperity, Ocean Molica, NV Sunshine or ST 3 files. The confirmed facts are the Seatrade 26 October composition of the PGSA table: 123 vessels, Senegal Prosperity 9532757 at 103 in place of the Angola Prosperity duplicate, Sea Soar 9177569 at 123, Angola Prosperity retained once at 102.<\/p>\n<h2>What Operators Should Note<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Log a 123-vessel PGSA table, not a second 40-ship action statement.<\/strong> Weekend increment on the dedicated 20 October 122-count piece. SENEGAL PROSPERITY 9532757 at 103. SEA SOAR 9177569 at 123. ANGOLA PROSPERITY 9896414 retained once at 102. Seatrade 26 October composition. Do not restate Tuesday\u2019s 40 \/ 19 \/ 2 \/ 30 figures unless PGSA reprints them. Do not replace JMIC Update 108. Hormuz remains SEVERE. There is no Update 109.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Treat Senegal Prosperity as a late listing of an existing IMO hull, not as a new attack.<\/strong> IMO board: 31 August, 17 NM east of Khasab, damaged, no pollution, IMO 9532757. Seatrade colour of three projectiles and engine-room \/ ballast-tank damage remains industry colour. Open-register colour only: Liberia VLCC, about 331 m, 320,780 dwt, Sinokor family, call sign A8KZ4. Dual appearance is two instruments. Listing is not an IMO increment past 121.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Treat Sea Soar as a new PGSA name without an IMO row.<\/strong> IMO 9177569, Panama LPG on the Seatrade reprint, about 170 m, 23,495 dwt, Naviboost \/ Gemini on register extracts, AIS colour still active in the Middle East. PGSA printed no attack date. The hull is not on the 27 October IMO 121-count board. Do not invent a UKMTO number. Do not collapse the name onto Leonora Kosan or onto Update 108\u2019s unnamed Limah LPG.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Screen the hull, then screen the counterparty.<\/strong> Appearing on the PGSA list is not a U.S., EU or UK sanctions listing. U.S. authorities have separately designated PGSA. Dual exposure is a counsel question. Charterer-fleet blacklisting remains a PGSA warning from the dedicated 122-count piece, not a named designation of a charterer on this increment.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Check STS, stores and crew-change plans against the named hulls.<\/strong> PGSA still says ships that work with listed vessels may themselves be added. Fujairah \/ Khor Fakkan remains the congested holding area on Update 108, about 194 at anchor on 25 October. Confirm whether the lighter, the bunker barge or the hull alongside is on the current official page before the operation. Do not treat a listing as a boarding power in UAE waters.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Verify against the official page before acting on a scrape.<\/strong> The list moves: duplicate Angola Prosperity removed, two named additions, sequential public counts of 124 then 122 then 123. Confirm the name and IMO on the PGSA page. ST3, Soyia, Chloe and Leonora Kosan are not on this 26 October reprint. Watch a named detention, a named confiscation, or a later PGSA table that adds those hulls \u2014 not a rewrite of Tuesday\u2019s 122\/40 status message except as this increment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Regulas Shipping will keep lining the Persian Gulf Strait Authority\u2019s Non-Compliance List against UKMTO numbered products, JMIC Update 108 and the IMO highlighted-incidents board so operators can treat the 123-count and the Senegal Prosperity \/ Sea Soar additions as an Iranian administrative increment, not as a targeting notice or a Hormuz reopen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Iran\u2019s Persian Gulf Strait Authority updated its Strait of Hormuz Non-Compliance List over the weekend. Seatrade Maritime News, by Middle East correspondent Gary Howard on 26 October, is the first detailed English composition check against the published names: the list now contains 123 vessels. SENEGAL PROSPERITY, IMO 9532757, has been added at position 103, a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1113,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"wpai_generated_summary":"","wpai_meta_description":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[26,20,4,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-highlights","category-maritime-regulations","category-maritime-security","category-regulatory-updates"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/regulasshipping.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/regulasshipping.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/regulasshipping.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regulasshipping.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regulasshipping.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/regulasshipping.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1115\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regulasshipping.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1113"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/regulasshipping.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regulasshipping.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regulasshipping.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}